I suggest that you refer to CISPR16 Clause 16. That specifies an OATS and its acceptability criteria fully.
Best regards, Neil R. Barker Compliance Engineering Manager Marconi Applied Technologies Ltd. 106 Waterhouse Lane Chelmsford Essex CM1 2QU U.K. Tel: +44 (01245) 453616 Fax: +44 (01245) 453410 E-mail: neil.bar...@marconi.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Aschenberg, Mat [mailto:matt.aschenb...@echostar.com] > Sent: 05 July 2002 15:49 > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: Measurement Consistency of OATS > > > > Hello, > Have any of you seen a paper written on the measurement > consistency of an > OATS? > If I were to have a product repeatedly measured at an OATS, > how close should > I expect the measurements to be? > For sake of this example, there are no cables. All measurements are > performed at the same OATS. The EUT is assumed not to change > between tests. > > Mat > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com > Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ > Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list" >
<<attachment: Barker,_Neil.vcf>>
