I read in !emc-pstc that iun...@servomex.com wrote (in <OF3F94F3F0.6C74C
b86-on80256cbc.004d2...@servomex.co.uk>) about ''DOW' of standards' on
Tue, 28 Jan 2003:
>The  OJ for the LVD (page C317/73) gives 1.1.2004 as being the date beyond
> which   IEC   61010-1:1990/A2:1995  can  no  longer  be  used  to  presume
> conformance  with the requirements of this Directive. After this date, can
> equipment  previously  assessed to this standard still be marketed without
> reassessment to the new standard (IEC 61010-1:2001)? If so, until when?

No, that's what 'dow' means. After that date, it's the new standard or
nothing. You might find it helpful to search for my post on 'docopocoss'
(Date Of Cessation Of Presumption Of Conformity Of the Superseded
Standard). I'd put it on my web site if I could remember the URL. (;-)
>
> Between  1.4.2001  (the  'dow' of IEC 61010-1:1990+A1:1992 (Modified)) and
> 1.1.2004   (the   dow   of   IEC  61010-1:1990/A2:1995),  can  either  IEC
> 61010-1:1990/A2:1995  or  IEC  61010-1:2001 be used to presume conformance
> with the requirements of LVD?

Yes.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to