>... BB conducted emissions from a battery charger...
>

The last product that I cert'ed was a PC based product, 
its ATX supply was a special model which contained a UPS.
During product certification I "discovered" the our product's 
worst conducted emissions occured when our product was "off" 
and the UPS was trickle charging its batteries. I don't like
surprises like this that end up add "extra modes of operation"
for product testing.

dave garnier

                        David Garnier
                        e GE Medical Systems
                        ___________________________________________
                        David S. Garnier
                        Senior Technician
                        PET Engineering
                        3000 N. Grandview Ave - M/S W-1250
                        Waukesha, Wi. 53188
                        Tel: 262.312.7246
                        





From: Doug Smith [mailto:d...@emcesd.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:38 AM
To: Grasso, Charles
Cc: 'lfresea...@aol.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: OK, what's going on?



Hi All,

Just wanted to put my 2 cents worth in. The same thing may be 
happening in Mil-spec testing. Recently, I was at a client's site for 
a purpose unrelated to this story.

I noticed interference to the measurement I was trying to make on a 
piece of equipment. The equipment had enough common mode current on 
its leads to fail emissions, even though it was turned off! There was 
a military battery charger for small batteries on their bench so I 
connected my current probe to its power cord and noticed enough common 
mode current to cause a 30 dB+ failure of emissions over a broad 
frequency range. I would suppose the battery charger had been tested 
to mil-specs. If so there is a problem here, even accounting for the 
repeatability problems in mil-spec testing.

Doug

Grasso, Charles wrote:
> Hi Derek - Go Reds!!
>  
> This is not a surprise to me. I have railed at much length a couple
> of years ago as to the latest FCC changes to the emissions
> qualification. I am sure you are familiar with it so I won't
> belabour the point. Fundementally the FCC PC emissions procedure
> has rendered the EMC discipline almost irrelevent. The new procedures
> coupled with the lack of enfocement makes it difficult to justify 
> the increased costs of EMC design & test. It also makes the 
> whole measurement uncertainty  push ridiculous. After all
> if the procedures allow for prodcut that 20dB out of spec why
> bother with a couple of dB of error??
>  
> Lets give the emissions standards some teeth or eliminate it
> all together.
>  
> Best Regards
> Charles Grasso
> Senior Compliance Engineer
> Echostar Communications Corp.
> Tel:  303-706-5467
> Fax: 303-799-6222
> Cell: 303-204-2974
> Email: charles.gra...@echostar.com;
<mailto:charles.gra...@echostar.com; >
> Email Alternate: chasgra...@ieee.org <mailto:chasgra...@ieee.org>
>  
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
>     Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:05 PM
>     To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>     Subject: OK, what's going on?
> 
>     Hi all,
> 
>     This e-mail has been prompted because of a number of things that
>     have all come together. This may take a little reading, but please
>     stick with it.
> 
>     Last note... this is not intended to pick on any individuals, or
>     organization, but I do want to stir the pot.
> 
......

-- 

     ___          _       Doug Smith
      \          / )      P.O. Box 1457
       =========          Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
    _ / \     / \ _       TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
  /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \     Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-----( )  |  o  |    Email:   d...@dsmith.org
  \ _ /    ]    \ _ /     Website: http://www.dsmith.org




This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to