Simple eqn to remember

                  (        2
skin depth = sqrt ( -------------- )
                  ( w * u * sigma 

w is radians per sec; or 2 pi f, with f in Hz
u is permeability . or . u rel * u free space
   u free space is 4 pi 10-7
sigma is conductivity in S/m
all MKS units so 
skin depth in meters

One important point to remember is that this formula
calculates skin depth, like attenuation versus depth, for a
*PLANAR WAVE*  

If the impinging wave has curvature, like from a close by
radiator; that wave really "punches" through and there is
not as much attenuation. 

How much?  Depends on curvature, but for close sources the
effective thickness can be reduced to less than half.    

Conclusion:. Use thicker material than you think you need.
 

                      - Robert -

       Robert A. Macy, PE .. m...@california.com
       408 286 3985 . . . .. . . fx 408 297 9121
       AJM International Electronics Consultants
       101 E San Fernando, Suite 402
       San Jose, CA  95112
 







On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:33:24 EDT
 garymcintu...@aol.com wrote:
>         My anal-retentive self is having some trouble
> with an occasional 
> example in the text and I need either a confirmation or a
> slap in the forehead.
>        I was just fiddling around with the text and
> reviewing some of the 
> examples and in section 6.4 he presents a table of skin
> depth for copper, but 
> then in question 6.2 he asks for the skin depth of steel
> - and the numbers for 
> the skin depth are the same. My calculations say
> otherwise and makes sense to me 
> since the permeability is different between the
> materials. copper = 1 and 
> steel is 1000, that and the conductivity is different
> between the two. 
>        If you have the text and little or nothing else to
> do could you give 
> me the number you come up with? ( in mm's or mils)
>        When I'm trying to learn or relearn stuff and I'm
> at odds with the 
> various references it just drives me wild and I don't
> have anyone else to confer 
> with up here. One is torn between the I'm right response
> and the author's 
> obvious authority on the subject.
>        Thanks
>        Befuddled (Gary)
>        



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to