All;

Mike Mertinooke suggested I take a look at GE Plastics website. Anybody
interested, there is a press release with mention of the ROHS Directive and
what GE Plastics is doing.

 

http://www.geplastics.com/press_pack/03_05_17.html

 

This is also the reason behind GE Plastics' development of chlorine and
bromine free, flame retardant, environmental friendly engineering
thermoplastics. These developments effectively anticipate upcoming
legislation, stemming from the European Union directive on Waste Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), for example. New materials such as LEXAN 925
and LEXAN EXL 9330 polycarbonate, GELOY DHRA 222 alloy, CYCOLOY CH6410 alloy,
as well as Thermocomp PCAF04FRHH, already meet the projected new demands that
will be made on materials particularly in respect of applications in the
appliances, business machines (computers, printers, scanners, faxes) and
telecommunications sectors.

 

I’m sure there are many others making bromine-free flame retardant plastics.
The biggest difficulty I see is for manufacturers who must replace existing
plastic enclosures. The bromine-free plastics may have different physical
properties, like shrink rate, etc., that may require expensive re-tooling.
Best to be planning ahead now…

 

Doug Massey

Product Safety Engineer

Advanced Compliance Solutions

Ph. (770) 831-8048

FAX (770) 831-8598

Visit our web home at http://www.acstestlab.com <http://www.acstestlab.com/> 

 


From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Doug Massey
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:08 PM
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; itl-...@itl.co.il; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: ETSI new rules for 2004

 

Richard and Richard and All:

 

The ROHS and WEEE Directive links are:

 

ROHS:  http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri
en/oj/dat/2003/l_037/l_03720030213en00190023.pdf

 

WEEE: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/
n/oj/dat/2003/l_037/l_03720030213en00240038.pdf

 

The ROHS Directive not only bans lead in solder, but also these other
environmentally unfriendlies:

Mercury (relays, sensors) – already banned in Sweden

Cadmium (NiCD batteries)

Poly-brominated biphenyls (PBB) 

Poly-brominated biphenyls (PBDE)

 

These last two are the main ingredients that give many thermoplastic materials
their flame retardant characteristics.   

 

I know that lead-free solders are now readily available – I hear it’s more
expensive, and process control is more difficult, but it looks like this ban
will present no major obstacles for manufacturers. Also, there are a bevy of
exemptions listed in the ROHS Annex:

7. — Lead in high melting temperature type solders (i.e. tin-lead solder
alloys containing more than 85 % lead),

— lead in solders for servers, storage and storage array systems (exemption
granted until 2010),

— lead in solders for network infrastructure equipment for switching,
signalling, transmission as well as network

management for telecommunication,

 

But what impact will the ban on PBBs and PBDEs have on the plastics industry?
Are there readily available V-1 or V-0 rated plastics available that are PBB
or PBDE – free? Or will we need to start designing products that rely on
limited energy rather than fire enclosures to limit the spread of flame?

 

Does anybody have any information regarding PBB and PBDE - free plastics rated
V-1 or V-0?

 

Also, has anyone considered how manufacturers will certify their compliance to
the ROHS Directive? Should a manufacturer declare compliance to the ROHS in a
DoC backed up by a product evaluation? I think that many manufacturers will,
and they will display this ROHS – DoC in their product literature and
marketing.

 

The WEEE Directive places a large responsibility on the member states to
coordinate collection and disposal sites for used electronics, and places the
financial burden for these activities on the manufacturers and distributors
– I assume in the form of taxes or disposal fees. 

 

I think there are still many open issues facing these Directives, and their
adoption and enforcement will be painful for everyone. However, I for one
applaud the Community for taking proactive steps to help protect the
environment for our descendants. It generally takes the passage of regulations
to force the manufacturing community to develop new, safer methods of
achieving the same product performance. When manufacturers have to make
product changes for a market as large as the EU/EFTA, those changes will end
up in all of their products, so in effect, the Community is impacting the
global environment in a positive way. 

 

Of course, being a cynical type fellow, I would expect that many manufacturers
and distributors will comply with the WEEE Directive by simply accepting the
returned consumer electronics, and shipping boatloads of them to one of the
rural landfills here in Georgia. 

 

Caio

 

Doug Massey

Product Safety Engineer

Advanced Compliance Solutions

Ph. (770) 831-8048

FAX (770) 831-8598

Visit our web home at http://www.acstestlab.com <http://www.acstestlab.com/> 

 


From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of richwo...@tycoint.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:50 AM
To: itl-...@itl.co.il; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: ETSI new rules for 2004

 

Richard, effective 1 July 2006, lead solder will not be allowed per the
Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, 2002/95/EC. Also refer to
the EU Directive on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE),
2002/96/EC.

 

Richard Woods 
Sensormatic Electronics 
Tyco International 

 


From: Stone, Richard [mailto:rst...@xl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:03 AM
To: ITL-EMC User Group; Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail)
Subject: ETSI new rules for 2004

hello group,

 

anyone have any word or update on required( ? )

lead free process for components being soldered on PC boards,

does it apply to anyhting else, parts used prior to solder process

or anything else pertaining to this?

A european ETSI new requirement?

 

heard rumors  a few months ago,

and nothing since..

 

thanks for your time,

Richard,

 

Richard A. Stone 
Excel Switching Corporation 
Compliance 
75 Perseverance Way 
Hyannis, MA. 02601 
508 862 3311 ph. 
508 862 3020 fax 
rst...@xl.com 

This email message and any attachments to it contain confidential information
that is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.  Any
review, retransmission, dissemination, printing, or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error,
please delete it or inform the sender.








From: ITL-EMC User Group [mailto:itl-...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:03 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail)
Subject: 47 CFR Part 90

Dear All, 
Does anyone know where I can download the latest version of FCC Rule 47 Part
90 (47CFR90) in pdf format? 
I would prefer to download the whole part in one file. 
Thanks to anyone who can assist. 
Regards 
David Shidlowsky 
Technical Writer 
EMC Laboratory 
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd. 
Kfar Bin Nun 
Israel 
Tel: +972-8-9797799 
Fax: +972-8-9797702 
Email: dav...@itl.co.il 
http://www.itl.co.il 
http://www.i-spec.com 
This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the message
and its attachments to the sender.

 


Reply via email to