In a message dated 11/11/2003 5:48:57 PM Central Standard Time,
drcuthb...@micron.com writes:

I do have a custom shielded test fixture that will allow the DIMM to be tested
alone. Any desired READ or WRITE pattern can be used. The stimulus equipment
resides in a shielded rack directly beneath the DIMM. The DIMM is mounted
vertically and is free to radiate into the hemisphere above the rack. Now,
what level do I test for? CISPR 22 ? I was told that a mother board can be CE
Marked if it is <6dB over the limit. The theory being that the enclosure will
(might?) provide >6dB of attenuation. If this is so then do I test the DIMM
this way?
 
The reason I asked about DIMMs is because after reading the appropriate
documents I was convinced that it had to be tested and later changed my mind.
Now I'm leaning towards testing being a requirement. 
 
   Dave Cuthbert
   Micron Technology

From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of POWELL, DOUG
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:49 PM
To: 'lfresea...@aol.com'
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: opinions, please


Derek,
 
Do you have a suggestion as to how the test should be performed?
 
-doug


Douglas E. Powell 
Corporate Compliance Dept.
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 
Fort Collins, CO 80525 USA 


From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:56 AM
To: john.radom...@modicon.com; mcinturff3...@msn.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: opinions, please


In a message dated 11/11/2003 9:36:21 AM Central Standard Time,
john.radom...@modicon.com writes:


The EMC guidelines read:  "... If the component is intended to be placed on
the market as a single commercial unit for distribution and/or final use
this function has to be available WITHOUT further adjustment or connections
other than SIMPLE ones which can be performed by any person not fully aware
of the EMC implications..."

After seeing all the other list positings and thinking some more, I'm going to
change my opinion on what this should be marked as. Originally, I said
component. But...
 
This is a module that when added to a PC brings new capibility. But, it also
adds a path for noise to exit a system that the manufacturer may have tested (
if they even did ) differently. 
 
So I guess, I would say now that the module should be CE marked, and at a
minimum, the contribution it makes to radiated emissions determined.
 
I guess my second 2 cents worth....
 
Derek N. Walton
Owner, L F Research EMI Design and Test Facility
Poplar Grove,
IL 61065
_______________________________________________________________
This message, including any attachments, may contain information
that is confidential and proprietary information of Advanced 
Energy Industries, Inc.  The dissemination, distribution, use 
or copying of this message or any of its attachments is 
strictly prohibited without the express written consent of 
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.

In Answer to Dave and Doug..
 
I did a whole bunch of plaing around measuring the SE of small shields and
came to the conclusion that a fixture, radiating onto a small mode stirred
chamber was the best way to get repeatable results.
 
The bad side of this is that there is no "legal" limit to work with.
 
I understand that there is an IC emissions test method in use in the
automotive world, though I don't believe it has any standing in the EU.
 
I guess my 8 cents now rests on testing the module in a PC chassis, with no
enclosure "lid". And that leaves a bunch of questions....
 
The intent of the test would be to show thae the module does not radiate
either noise made by itself, or, provide a path for noise from within the MB
to escape. Sitting here, with a hot cup of Earl Gray tea.. I can't think why
it would not be appropriate to apply the normal limits. With the advent of the
plastic PC enclosures, you have to assume tha the case has 0 dB shielding..
 
I do like the idea of a fixture though, so that the module could be easily
closed at different frequencies to see if there was a worst case.
 
Back to my tea :-)
 
Derek N. Walton
Owner, L F Research EMI Design and Test Facility
Poplar Grove,
IL 61065

Reply via email to