In article <[email protected]. com>, Gary McInturff <[email protected]> writes
> Your example, in my opinion, switches apples an oranges. I specifically used 'hi-fi' and 'industrial', to make it quite clear (as I thought) that no-one would consider my examples ambiguous. The standard definition of professional equipment, that originated in IEC 61000-3-2, is now being adopted in several other IEC standards. It covers ALL professional equipment, including industrial PCs, and is not significantly in disagreement with the 'not sold retail' criterion that you indicated. In fact, my first proposal for the definition included those words, but the non-English speakers didn't like the word 'retail'. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
