In article <4223b50f.6090...@ptcnh.net>, Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net> writes
>The 107A CB Bulletin for 60950-1 lists a national deviation for Korea : >Product must complies with relevant CISPR standard. The Korean National Committee should know that it is very undesirable to use one standard to enforce another, and especially to mix up EMC and safety issues. The latter is because EMC is one thing and EMC in the context of functional safety is quite another. A higher degree of immunity may be required to achieve functional safety than is required for basic EMC. > >Does this mean that product has to comply with Class B limit or only >with CISPR 22 limits ? If it doesn't specifically say 'Class B', all the provisions of CISPR 22 apply, including those for Class A. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
