In message <20060215174652.842.qm...@web30506.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doug Beckwith <dougbeckw...@yahoo.ca> writes >Isn't CISPR 16-4 the preferred method? This is what was specified to >us by our accrediting agency.
No. Because the ETSI reference is dated, that is the reference that MUST be used, irrespective of whether there is anything later and/or better. That is why it's necessary to address the fact that there IS no 1998 edition. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately. John Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
