In message <2a93eb060608091024h274cf040w98474b21dcc66...@mail.gmail.com>, dated Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Grace Lin <graceli...@gmail.com> writes
>I don't understand the first paragraph of Annex III. My question is: >do I need to have my lab (in a manufacturer) registed with one of >notified bodies to be considered to be essential? No, it says that the Notified Body has to tell you which tests your product requires. >If not, what is the marking requirement, "CE" ( 433.92MHz) or "CE plus >alert sign" (2.4GHz SS), or others? I think that's a different, and perhaps unrelated, question. I don't have enough data about your product to answer it, and I don't normally advise on RTTE stuff. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
