Grace,
 
read the appendix 3 of the NPL paper.
They state that " free-space antenna factor is appropriate for 3  m
measurements".
 
This is what we also use as it minimises the uncertainties from height
scanning.
Note that the free-space AF should not be used if you check your site NSA;
there you need height-specific antenna factors.
 
Regards,
Ari Honkala


  _____  

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of ext Grace Lin
Sent: 29. helmikuuta 2008 4:29
To: Luke Turnbull
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Free Space Antenna Factor


Dear John, Ken, Luke and others,
 
Thank you so much for your comments.  I printed out the document from the link
Luke provided.  I ran out of time in the office to read it.
 
Please allow me to explain my question more detail.  One of antennas I
purchased came with free space antenna factors.  According to ANSI C63.5:
2006,  free space antenna factors are done at 10-meter distance.  I will
perform radiated emission measurement at 3-meter.  Should I use the free space
antenna factors without any calculation?  Or, is there any equation to convert
free space antenna factors for measurement distance other than 10-meter?
 
The antenna vendor told me to use the free space antenna factors, then compare
limit to 10-meter limits.  I am not convinced to do so as this will have about
10 dB difference.  To confirm my concern, I had a friend, who works at a
well-known commercial lab and has the same model of the antenna, fax me his
antenna factors at 3m and 10m.  I list some data below for your reference. 
Free space antenna factors are from my antenna.  3m and 10m data are
horizontal polarization.
 
 
30MHz-19.6 (3m), 18.7 (10m), 17.8 (free space) 
40MHz-14.2 (3m), 13.7 (10m), 11.9 (free space) 
50MHz-9.9 (3m), 9.1 (10m), 7.3 (free space) 
60MHz-6.8 (3m), 7.1 (10m), 5.45 (free space) 
70MHz-7.2 (3m), 7.3 (10m), 5.2 (free space) 
80MHz-8.7 (3m), 7.4 (10m), 6.5 (free space) 
90MHz-10.2 (3m), 9.4 (10m), 8.75 (free space) 
100MHz-11.8 (3m), 11.3 (10m), 10.5 (free space) 
200MHz-10.9 (3m), 10.3 (10m), 9 (free space) 
300MHz-14.5 (3m), 13.2 (10m), 13 (free space) 
400MHz-17.1 (3m), 16.2 (10m), 15.9 (free space) 
500MHz-18.6 (3m), 17.5 (10m), 17.25 (free space) 
600MHz-19.9 (3m), 18.6 (10m), 18.5 (free space) 
700MHz-20.2 (3m), 18.8 (10m), 19.18 (free space) 
800MHz-21.3 (3m), 19.9 (10m), 19.6 (free space) 
900MHz-22.2 (3m), 20.8 (10m), 20.35 (free space) 
1000MHz-22.9 (3m), 20.9 (10m), 20.9 (free space) 

>From the above data, I don't find any difference between 3m and 10m close to
10 dB.
 
Thank you and look forward to your help.
 
Best regards,
Grace
On 2/28/08, Luke Turnbull <luke.turnb...@trw.com> wrote: 

Grace,
 
Have a look at the following guide from NPL, Page 41.  (Sorry, you have to
give them your name and address to download it).  The correction is because
the actual receiving element of a log-periodic may vary in distance between
about 2.5 and 3.5m.  The correction gives the field that would be at 3m
distance from the product.
 
http://publications.npl.co.uk/npl_web/pdf/mgpg4.pdf
 
Good Luck,
 
Luke Turnbull

>>> "Grace Lin" <graceli...@gmail.com> 27 February 2008 18:48 >>>
 

Dear Members,
 
Could someone please teach me how to scale free space antenna factors for my
3-meter distance measurement?  One antenna vendor told me that I could scale
free space antenna factors.  I couldn't reach this vendor at the moment.
 
Thank you and look forward to hearing from you.
 
Best regards,
Grace
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Conekt is a trading division of TRW Limited 

Registered in England, No. 872948 

Registered Office Address: Stratford Road, Solihull B90 4AX 


































- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to