> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard
> Nute > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:46 PM > To: John Woodgate > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 vs IEC 60601-1 > > > May I suggest, then, that you try it out with UL standards.(;-) In > IEC, > > we have QUITE enough problems trying to 'integrate' just two > standards - > > 60065 and 60950 - into 62368. > > IEC 62368 was NEVER intended to be an integration > of 60065 and 60950. > > Unfortunately, that is what is happening. > > Worse still, it additionally incorporates its > original objectives of being product and > technology independent. The heart wants what the heart wants! Ed Price [email protected] <blocked::mailto:[email protected]> WB6WSN NARTE Certified EMC Engineer Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Applications San Diego, CA USA 858-505-2780 Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
