Alternately, a test with a DC voltage of the peak value of the corresponding

AC voltage will help you draw the right conclusion. Not all

standards allow the replacement of AC by DC tests, however.

Most standards do allow the removal of phase-ground components

(if certified) such as varistors and capacitors (emc filters) before

carrying out the test. This is not very feasible during

production tests, however.

 

 

Regards,

Ing. Gert Gremmen





ce-test, qualified testing bv

 

 

Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens John Allen
Verzonden: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:20 PM
Aan: 'Ted Eckert'; 'Robert F. Keller'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: RE: Current limit for Dielectric Test

 

Hi Folks

 

>From experience, I agree with what Ted says - especially w.r.t. his last
paragraph about setting a LOWER limit.

 

Failure to exceed the lower limit could also indicate a faulty EMI filter with
capacitors of lower values than specification - thus meaning you may have an
emissions issue with the units in question.

 

I used to sample a batch of a dozen or so units for each type of unit, and
then set higher and lower limits for the test personnel to check.

 

Regards

 

John Allen

 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ted 
Eckert
        Sent: 13 November 2008 16:51
        To: Robert F. Keller; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
        Subject: RE: Current limit for Dielectric Test

        Hello Rob,

         

        There is no current limit specified, and there is no way a limit could 
be
specified.  Take a look at IEC 60950-1 section 5.1.7.  You will see that there
are types of equipment where the touch current is allowed to exceed 3.5 mA. 
This is typically equipment that is field wired or at least has an industrial
locking plug.  The high touch current is often due to a significant amount of
filtering in the power supply including Y-capacitors.  If these capacitors
(and other circuits bridging primary to ground) are allowing over 3.5 mA at
the normal operating voltage, they will pass far more current at the voltages
used for the electric strength test.  

         

        I have worked with high power telecommunication rectifiers that have a 
lot of
filtering on their input.  They have a very high touch current, but they are
field wired and have a solid ground connection.  The risk to the user from the
touch current is quite low.  The amount of current that flows during the
electric strength test is quite high.

         

        You should know what the expected current will be during the electric
strength test.  You can calculate it from the test voltage and the impedance
of the circuits between primary and ground.  Giving some safety margin to this
value, you can generally select a reasonable starting point for the upper
limit on your testing.  As the standard notes, a failure is a dramatic
increase in current, not a constant high current.  You need to know your
equipment to determine the proper test limits.

         

        Many types of electric strength testers will also let you set a lower 
limit
for failure.  This too should be set properly.  If the current during the
electric strength test is too low, you may have a bad test setup or a bad
connection in your product.

         

        Ted Eckert

        Compliance Engineer

        Microsoft Corporation

        ted.eck...@microsoft.com

         

        The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those 
of my
employer.

         

         

        From: Robert F. Keller [mailto:r...@cclab.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:36 AM
        To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
        Subject: Current limit for Dielectric Test

         

        Hello Group,
        
        I have a question regarding the Electric Strength test in 60950-1 
section
5.2.  It says in that section that you have a failure or the insulation broke
down when the current which flows as a result of the application of the test
voltage rapidly increases in an uncontrolled manner.  So, is there an exact
current limit at which it is considered to have "shorted"?  And if so, is this
printed in any standard?  
        Any insight in this would be greatly appreciated.
        
        Best Regards, 
        Rob Keller 
        Senior Engineer 
        Communication Certification Laboratory 
        Ph.: 801.972.6146   Ext.237
        Fax: 801-972-8432
        r...@cclab.com

        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------

        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 

        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
        Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
        David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com 

        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------

        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 

        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        
        Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
        Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        
        Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
        David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com 

        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to