Hi Andy,
 
In the UK it is the same. Developers of radio equipment are required to
suppress the harmonic and spurious radiated emission levels to a level lower
than the general radiate emission limits given for domestic environments [for
most of the spectrum, this is true - there are some exceptions]
 
The only reason I have ever been given, is that radio designers have (or
should have) the knowledge and test equipment to achieve these levels AND
because the equipment is likely to be connected to an antenna mounted at a
reasonable height above ground.
 
The general requirement is applied to non-radio equipment, where the designer
might not have the knowledge or the equipment to achieve the lower levels.
Since the equipment is likely to be used at a normal height, not normally
connected to an antenna and normally used inside a building [a lot of
generalisation on my part here] the permitted levels will actually have a
lower risk of causing interference to radio systems.
 
I do not know if the same logic has been applied in America but it might have
been.
 
Regards
Tim

************************

Tim Haynes A1N10

Electromagnetic Engineering Specialist

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems 

300 Capability Green

Luton LU1 3PG

( Tel      : +44 (0)1582 886239

7 Fax     : +44 (0)1582 795863

) Mob    : +44 (0)7703 559 310

* E-mail : tim.hay...@selexgalileo.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

 

There are 10 types of people in the world-those who understand binary and
those who don't. J. Paxman

 

________________________________

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Andrew McCallum
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:44 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: FCC Part 15.109 and 15.209 Radiated emission limits


*** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 
        
Happy new year all
 
Can anyone explain why an unintentional radiator is allowed to have higher
emission limits than an intentional radiator. By design you would hope that
spurious emissions from an intentional radiator would be lower but why have
two different limits? 
 
Any help much appreciated.
 
regards
 
Andy


________________________________


Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the
addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf) and may
be confidential or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take
no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please
delete them from your system and reply to this e mail highlighting the error.

Security: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that
internet e-mail is not 100% secure. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail
is taken to accept this.

Viruses: We have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are
virus free, but we advise that in keeping with good computing practice you
should ensure that they are actually virus free. 
________________________________



DeltaRail Group Limited registered office Hudson House, 2 Hudson Way, Pride
Park, Derby, DE24 8HS. Registered in England and Wales, number 5839985. Please
refer to www.deltarail.com 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14
3EL
A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

        
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to