The severity of the test using a CDN is much more repeatable compared to the
EM-clamp. With a clamp test, how the auxillary end of the cable is terminated
has a profound affect on the test since it affects the total circuit
impedance. It could make the test either less or more severe.  This is where
subclauses 7.3 and 7.4 of 61000-4-6 come into play.
 
If I were to test a shielded cable using an EM-clamp, I would short the cable
shield to the ground plane on the AE side. This would lower the overall
circuit impedance, making it a more severe test in most cases.  Then I would
use a feedback probe on the EUT side to measure the induced current and limit
the induced level based on that measurement, according to subclause 7.4 of the
standard.
 
Obviously, when allowed, the preferred method is to use a CDN for shielded
cables.
 
Bob Richards, NCT

--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Sterner, David (NY80) <david.ster...@honeywell.com> wrote:


        From: Sterner, David (NY80) <david.ster...@honeywell.com>
        Subject: RE: EN61000-4-6: coupling to shielded cable
        To: "Charles Blackham" <charles.black...@sulisconsultants.com>,
emc-p...@ieee.org
        Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 11:10 AM
        
        
        Charlie -
        
        The immunity document for security systems, EN 50130-4, specifies a CDN
        for screened cable; we use the Fischer CDN on video cable.  EN 55024
        (ITE) does not specify a test procedure for screened cable.  Our
        comparative results on the same 75-ohm cable link indicate that the
        CDN-75 provides a much more severe stress than the (Fischer) E-M clamp.
        
        Outlook: 
        Products that 'pass' using the E-M clamp on sccreened cables are very
        likely to fail if retested, i.e. by an agency or an OEM customer.
        E-M results on video products are likely to give one a false sense of
        security; image degradation will be more severe with the CDN.
        
          _                                Honeywell
          David W. Sterner
          Quality Assurance Engineering
          2 Corporate Center Drive Suite 100
          P.O. Box 9040
          Melville, NY   11747
          Phone: (516) 577-2321 
          Fax: (516) 577-3540
         david.ster...@honeywell.com
         <http://www.honeywell.com> 
        
        
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Charles
        Blackham
        Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 1:49 AM
        To: emc-p...@ieee.org
        Subject: EN61000-4-6: coupling to shielded cable
        
        Group
        
        We have a unit with a 2-wire shielded signal cable that falls under
        EN61326-2-3 and also requirements of NAMUR (automation technology in
        process industries).
        
        We have been performing EN61000-4-6 Conducted Immunity tests on the
        shielded cable using a coupling clamp as the injection method, however
        client is requesting we use a CDN
        
        Does anyone perform such testing using a CDN?
        
        regards
        Charlie
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
        emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
        e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
        URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
        Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
        David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
        discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
        <emc-p...@ieee.org>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
        Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
        David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to