example based on tests done with UL personnel - the 94V-0 rating
is based on:

Flaming combustion time for each specimen less than or equal to
10sec
 - AND -
Summation of total flaming combustion time for all 5 specimens of
any set less than or equal to 50 sec

for each individual test, any single failure requires a complete
new sample set, where no failures are allowed.

also interested in hearing about requirements of any other NRTL
when the test standard is UL94.



From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
Momcilovic, Nick (GE Healthcare)
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:01 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: UL 94 Table 8.1 Interpretation

I have heard two interpretations for the first two criteria
conditions
shown in Table 8.1 of UL 94.  If you are familiar with the
flammability
testing of UL 94, let me know which interpretations you believe
are
correct.  I have heard arguments for both.

First criteria - "Afterflame time for each individual specimen t1
or t2"

Int.1 - both t1 AND t2 have to be equal or less than x-seconds
Int.2 - either t1 OR t2 can be less than x-seconds

Second Criteria - "Total afterflame time for any condition set
(t1 plus
t2 for the 5 specimens)"

Int.1 - t1+t2 for each individual sample has to be equal or less
than
x-seconds
Int.2 - t1+t2 for all 5 samples cumulative has be equal or less
than
x-seconds

Regards,
Nick Momcilovic

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>


Reply via email to