In message <c886e31f.841a0%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, dated Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> writes:
>Uncertainty for modulation parameters of depth or pulse on-off ratio >and time duration? Uncertainty applies to things like field intensity, >where the construction of the room or OATS and near field effects >combine to provide significant uncertainty. > >But something easily measured with an o'scope of modest (audio) >performance? That is a totally unwarranted extension of the concept. > Unfortunately, it isn't. The metrologists have inflicted formal uncertainty assessment on us and it's like death and taxes - always with us. Everything has to have its uncertainty assessed. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK If at first you don't succeed, delegate. But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
