Regarding the second part of question #3:  “How were the charge and
discharge time constants selected for the first QP detectors and why were they
changed over the years? How was the bandwidth selected? [Note: the 9 kHz
bandwidth was the prevalent bandwidth of radio receivers for sound broadcast
reception at the time. EdB] “

Ed answers the question himself concerning BW.  In order to get the best
signal quality, the receiver bandwidth should match the broadcast signal BW. 
The same applies to assessing the effect of rfi.  9 kHz and 120 kHz mirror
broadcast radio reception in the AM and FM bands (LF – Europe only, MF, and
VHF).  A very real problem arises when using these BW (and by extension QP
detector) in assessing TVI.  There were in the past dithered clocks provided
so that the spectral distribution of harmonics would fall outside any one 120
kHz BW, and thus the QP detector would average the harmonic content that fell
in a BW, and it would be smaller than if the frequency had been fixed with all
harmonic amplitude contained in one BW.  The dithering worked with 120 kHz BW,
but didn’t move a signal outside a broadcast TV channel, and there were
reports that the dithered clock harmonics were actually more disruptive to TV
reception than if the harmonics had been fixed in frequency.
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261



________________________________

From: <ralph.mcdiar...@ca.schneider-electric.com>
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:18:25 -0700
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re:  the QP detector


Here is a link to an interesting historical note on the Quasi-peak Detector.  
Hopefully, someone on this forum can answer one or more of the questions at
the end of the article to enlighten the rest of us. 

http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs/
ewsletters/emcs/summer01/pp.bronaugh.htm
<http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs
newsletters/emcs/summer01/pp.bronaugh.htm>
<http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs
newsletters/emcs/summer01/pp.bronaugh.htm>  
_______________________________________
_____________________________________________ 

Ralph McDiarmid  |  Schneider Electric  |  Renewable Energies Business  |  
CANADA  |   Compliance Engineer 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to