In message <64f94c18f6d40243bcf3fc0a8a4bda792ebab89...@mshq11.thoratec.com>, dated Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Bryce Stammerjohan <bstammerjo...@thoratec.com> writes:
>Any reason why you need radiated susceptibility at such low >frequencies, when other products/standards assume that there is little >or no coupling of relatively small devices (even 2 m tall ones) to RF >waves on the order of 10+ meters long? Will it have very long, exposed >external cables? There can be unforeseen resonances with on-board reactive components. The antenna need not be that long, a few metres may be enough. At 560 V/m, there could be sparks and smoke. I have seen an AM radio with just a fried antenna coupling coil, probably due to a not-very-nearby lightning stroke, not even noticed by the receiver's owner -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
