You stated that the test was also done in a screened room.  That is a room
with all 6 surfaces made of metal.  You can and will get a very large field in
areas of the room just as you can get nulls in the room also.  So basically
you have a high gain antenna, a maxed power amp and a room that reflects rf
energy in an unpredictable fashion.  The RAM was probably in one of those
spots of high field intensity caused by all the above factors.  The result is
poof, call the fire department.

 

Performing rf immunity is a shielded room is not the best of ideas as it is
uncontrollable and unpredictable.

 

 

Dennis Ward 
American TCB 
Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 
703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 
direct - 703-880-4841 

 

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jason Smith
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:32 AM
To: Price, Edward; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] 61000-4-3 and 61000-4-20 Field Uniformity Requirements

 

Tim was not stating the amplifier was supplying 20 times its power but with
the antenna gain included there was 20 times the power in the field. TWT
amplifiers have high harmonics it is the nature of the beast when we test TWTA
we filter out all harmonics to guarantee what the fundamental power is. Also a
TWT does not draw more input power as it puts out more output power (or at
least does not significantly change). So as the harmonics increase there is no
more significant draw from the AC power. It’s like getting more power for
free. 

 

I don’t think when using a waveguide antenna that there would be a good
match outside of its band and the gain would not increase like this all the
way up to the 7th harmonic but there no doubt would be significantly power in
the field from the harmonics. And add the possibility of standing waves caused
by the EUT (depending on how lager) which could have focused on a part of the
RAM, putting it over the edge. 

 

Thank you, 
Jason H. Smith
Manager Applications Engineer
ar rf/microwave instrumentation

 

________________________________

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Price, Edward
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] 61000-4-3 and 61000-4-20 Field Uniformity Requirements

 

Tim:

 

I’m not doubting your story, but, I’m having some difficulty understanding
where this power came from. If the sum of the incident power applied to the
RAM was 20 times the level of the fundamental, then are you saying that the
TWT tube was delivering 20 times its rated power, and that the amplifier was
supplying 20 times its design level? And that the instrument was drawing 20
times its normal AC input power?

 

Ed Price

ed.pr...@cubic.com <blocked::mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com>      WB6WSN

NARTE Certified EMC Engineer

Lab Rat (day shift)

Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab

Cubic Defense Applications

San Diego, CA  USA

858-505-2780

Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

 

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Haynes, Tim
(SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:19 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] 61000-4-3 and 61000-4-20 Field Uniformity Requirements

 

Dear All,

 

A cautionary tale.

Some twenty years ago, a young engineer was doing some “immunity testing”
of a circuit to high power uWave.

 

The engineer “cranked” up the power into the TWT until the output was as
high as he could get. The TWT was an experimental wide-band amplifier (many
octave wide).

 

The test set-up had a horn antenna radiating towards the circuit with a block
of RAM behind – all in a screened room.

He had done the safety calculations for the maximum power output of the TWT,
the gain of the horn at the operating frequency and the distance between horn,
and the RAM was within its ratings.

 

Then the fire started – the RAM was smouldering, choking fumes everywhere.
After the “fire” was out – I was called in to investigate. 

 

I am not going to describe how this was all investigated – but the findings
were that the TWT was so overdriven that the harmonics were within fractions
of a dB of the fundamental. The measuring equipment could only measure to the
seventh harmonic and all the harmonics and the fundamental were present.

The antenna was fed with waveguide which, although overmoded, presented little
in the way of attenuation at the harmonics.

The antenna itself also worked quite efficiently at the harmonics and the
effective gain increased with the square of the harmonic number
(approximately).

The power at each harmonic was approximately 1/7th of the rated TWT output

 

Instead of there being one unit of power at the RAM he had created

 

1/7+4/7+9/7+16/7+25/7+36/7+49/7 = 140/7=20 times the original incident power!

 

It is the best example of harmonic induced problems that I have ever seen.

 

Regards

Tim

 

 

 

 

************************

Tim Haynes A1N10

Electromagnetic Engineering Specialist

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems 

300 Capability Green

Luton LU1 3PG

( Tel      : +44 (0)1582 886239

7 Fax     : +44 (0)1582 795863

) Mob    : +44 (0)7703 559 310

* E-mail : tim.hay...@selexgalileo.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

 

There are 10 types of people in the world-those who understand binary and
those who don't. J. Paxman

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to