Hello Ron, I would rather not disclose the NRTL. It is a Canadian National differences to UL 61010-1 dated October 8, 2008. See the text below.
5.1.5DV D2 Addition of the following for Canada only. This does not apply in the United States: Product markings shall provide indication of the requirements to which they comply. The following symbol shall be marked on the product to indicate compliance with the requirements of CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 61010-1, 2nd edition, including Amendment 1. The documentation for the product shall describe the intent of this symbol as follows, or in equivalent wording:- "This product has been tested to the requirements of CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 61010-1, second edition, including Amendment 1, or a later version of the same standard incorporating the same level of testing requirements". Note: The number within the "C" may be incremented if different test requirements are adopted in the future. Thanks, Mark From: Ronald R. Wellman [mailto:rwell...@wellman.com] Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 8:46 AM To: Mark Schmidt; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Canada Requirement Hello Mark, This is the first time I've heard this. Considering that, could you please let us know who the NRTL is making this request, and what supporting documentation they are using to support this labeling claim. Best regards, Ron Wellman From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Mark Schmidt Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:02 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Canada Requirement Hello all, It has been requested by a NRTL based on National differences for UL 61010-1 that a new requirement to CSA C22.2 61010-1 is that a symbol (consisting of a C with a 1 inside the C) label is to be placed on the device and a statement in the manual stating: "This product has been tested to the requirements of CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 61010-1, second edition, including Amendment 1, or a later version of the same standard incorporating the same level of testing requirements". Has anyone else been required to do this doesn't seem very logical. Thanks, Mark Schmidt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
