On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:59:56 -0700, "George Stults" <george.stu...@watchguard.com> wrote:
> A question has come my way about a device with an integral laser > pointer. This built-in laser pointer is used to aim a video camera and ... > I would like to hear from anyone that could offer insight into whether > there might be an alternative classification or approach that could > apply to this device, as it simply can't meet some of these requirements > (3,4,5,7) because of it's intentional design. Yes, there is an alternative. Products which didn't satisfy either of the seven requirements you listed may also be accepted if it satisfied the requirements for Class 1 laser product, assuming exposure up to 30000 seconds. Regards, Tom Tomonori Sato <vef00...@nifty.ne.jp> URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
