See Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adam (RIP) – and the story of Wonko the Sane and instructions written on a packet of tooth picks.
Book 3 I think Andy From: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] Sent: 31 July 2009 11:56 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Andrew McCallum Subject: Re: Workplace Safety Rules I expect shortly someone will need me to affix an A4 paper at my monitor saying "Monitor screen. Read here what computer tells you." Best Regards Piotr Galka MicroMade Poland ----- Original Message ----- From: Flavin, John <mailto:john.fla...@teradata.com> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:56 PM Subject: Workplace Safety Rules I like to know this group's experiences regarding the following, which has been put into my lap to resolve. Our plant manager recently arranged a class on electrical safety (based on OSHA regulations and the NFPA 70E standard) for our engineering staff who work in all of our labs. The instructor was given a tour of our facility, including our Safety and EMI labs (due to the large size and power requirements of our products, we have our own safety and EMI labs. Safety testing is witnessed by a test engineer from an outside lab, which writes the CB reports for us; our EMI lab is NVLAP accreditted). During the course of the class, the instructor showed several "examples" of items taken from both these labs as possible items which were "unsafe". For example, he showed a power cord which had a section of the outer insulation stripped off, so that the individual insulated conductors were visible, and asked if this was safe. (How else do you put a current clamp around one conductor in a 3phase, 5 wire cord?). Our plant manager wanted to know why a 32A pin and sleeve connector with the appropriate HAR cordage (which we use when our product is sold in Europe) didn't have 6 gauge UL approved cordage. Adapters to allow us to connect our EUT to LISNs and CDNs for EMI testing likewise were suspect. There were other examples, but you get the idea. We're not talking about using wire nuts and duct tape to kludge together some AC cords to provide 50A service to our product. All these adapters have been built for a specific purpose, and use the appropriate sized conductors for the rated current of the plug/connector. The class also covered activities which can only be performed by a "qualified worker" (as defined by OSHA). Examples given were using a voltmeter to read AC line voltage, or replacing plugs/connectors on AC mains cords. As we test our products for both domestic (60Hz) and European (50Hz), we have two large synthetic power sources, and to avoid destroying very expensive racks of equipment, we routinely check the AC voltage before we plug in our products. Apparently, we are not qualified to do this. I understand our plant manager's concern that OSHA might cite some of these things as safety violations, which would cost us $$$ to rectify, and would probably shut down our lab from doing any work until we satisfy OSHA. His view is that it's not sufficient that these two labs are restricted access (all of us working in these labs have been issued numbered, "do not duplicate" keys), but that there must be detailed instructions for the use of every item, and for every type of measurement we make, and that any of this equipment should be locked away within these locked labs (which is a non-trivial issue for our EMI lab). He argued that these types of things are the proverbial "attractive nuisance", prone to abuse. My questions are 1) If an OSHA inspector were to visit an EMI or safety lab, would he be sufficiently knowledgeable as to what type of work is normally done there, or would he essentially "go by the book", and if it isn't in the NEC or NFPA, it's bad? Does anyone have any experience (good or bad) with this? 2) The thought of having to write, in excruciating detail, a procedure for every conceivable type of measurement we make, or could make hardly seems a productive use of my time, considering that the intended audience are already well versed in these practices, and that I couldn't possibly cover the universe of measurements we may do in the future. As part of our EMI lab training, we make a general statement that lab personnel shall be capable of using lab equipment such as voltmeters, current probes, oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers etc. for debugging, which implies knowing how to use them to make appropriate measurements. Is this good enough? What level of detail is appropriate? What do other labs do to address this? John D. Flavin Teradata TCP Engineering 17095 Via del Campo San Diego, CA 92127 john.fla...@teradata.com V: (858) 485-3874 F: (213) 337-5432 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunitiesorg/emc-pstc http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listservieee.org/request/user-guide.html <http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==> to report this email as spam. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunitiesorg/emc-pstc http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-psesorg/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> ________________________________ Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf) and may be confidential or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please delete them from your system and reply to this e mail highlighting the error. Security: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that internet e-mail is not 100% secure. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is taken to accept this. Viruses: We have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are virus free, but we advise that in keeping with good computing practice you should ensure that they are actually virus free. ________________________________ DeltaRail Group Limited registered office Hudson House, 2 Hudson Way, Pride Park, Derby, DE24 8HS. Registered in England and Wales, number 5839985. Please refer to www.deltarail.com - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
