IMO: These details do not belong in a Test Report, but do belong in
*other* documents provided to customers who perform some kinds of
maintenance or have it performed by a third party on one's product. In
some cases they may be required; TEMPEST, Safety of Flight, and Medical
Equipment being examples.
I think a Test Report should and must say only what applicable laws,
standards and regulations require -- but all of that.
Cortland Richmond
On 3/13/2013 1148, Scott Xe wrote:
Critical component in EMC report
It is common not to have critical component list in EMC reports
issued from 3rd party laboratories. Those information are
essential to track if the correct parts to be used in mass
production. What is main reason not to have it as a common
practice in the field?
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
