Whenever you use an LISN, you should always characterize the port loss. At
the lowest frequency end of your measurement range, it will not be
surprising to find a several dB correction factor is needed to be added to
your data to compensate for response roll-off. And if you use two similar
LISN's, characterize each one for its unique port loss curve.

 

As others have posted, you can't interchangeably use either a current probe
or an LISN. (Remember that the LISN imposes a new impedance in series with
the powerline, while the current probe is relatively non-intrusive.) Look
back to the compliance document to tell you which method to use.

 

Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA



 

From: McDiarmid, Ralph [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 1:52 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] question - emission measurements below 150kHz

 

Dear EMC-PSTC forum members, 

Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz, would
it be better to: 

1. characterise 50ohm LISN for insertion loss down to 9kHz 
2. use a current clamp rated for that frequency and use transfer impedance
to determine dB(uV) 

I can see that impedance of 50ohm/50uH LISN could be an issue at frequencies
< 100kHz approx. 

thanks, 

____________________________________________________________________________
___ 

Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  |
Regulatory Compliance Engineering

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to