All,

John's comment about "improved", devices prompted a thought. Often these so called improvements involve making devices faster and more efficient. This speed increase has to do with reverse recovery times of diodes and storage time of switching transistors (slew rates).  The reciprocal of 200 MHz is 9 nS; very fast. Most power switching devices produce odd harmonics from the fundamental of the pulse frequency.  However, fast slewing edges can produce both even and odd harmonics. 

Look for components used in the switching power supply or data drivers with high current drive with edge times of 9, 18, 27, 36, or 45 nS; approximately.  Some MOS FET clock drivers can produce a few amps of high frequency circulating current.

If the power supply turns out to be the problem AND it is not part of the product evaluation, replace it with a linear lab quality power supply or batteries. Alternatively, I've heard it said you can "clean up" a switch mode power source with a minimum of 7 stages of alternating common mode and differential mode EMI filters.  

Thanks, - doug

Douglas Powell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp0

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 12:01 PM
Reply To: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: [PSES] Puzzle

In message <[email protected]>,
dated Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Derek Walton <[email protected]> writes:

>In the meantime, can anyone make suggestions about what may cause this
>noise, besides parasitic oscillations/faulty parts, and what radiating
>mechanisms can be uninfluenced with the protection measures I took.

You **seem** to have covered all the angles, but we must conclude that
you haven't. Are you QUITE sure about the absence of ambient? Will the
chip makers proudly confirm that they 'improved' on or more of the
devices? Did you try another spectrum analyser?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>

Reply via email to