HI Neils

Your client should understand that it is not his point of view that matters,
it is what the FCC says about the device and what they say needs to be done
in order for the device to be authorized.   The simple fact that it can, at
any time, connect to a PC and download software makes this a Computer
Peripheral.  It does not matter how often it can be done, nor how many times
it is actually done, the fact that it can be done and that it is a consumer
device makes this device a Class B Computing Device Peripheral subject to
DoC or Certification, depending on how the grantee wants to address the
authorization.

Thanks 

 

 

Dennis Ward

Senior Certification Engineer

PCTEST

This communication and its attachments contain information from PCTEST
Engineering Laboratory, Inc., and is intended for the exclusive use of the
recipient (s) named above. It may contain information that is confidential
and/or legally privileged. Any unauthorized use that may compromise that
confidentiality via distribution or disclosure is prohibited. Please notify
the sender immediately if you receive this communication in error, and
delete it from your computer system.  Usage of PCTEST email addresses for
non-business related activities is strictly prohibited. No warranty is made
that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other
defect.  Thank you.

 

From: Niels Hougaard [mailto:n...@bolls.dk] 
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:05 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Concerning FCC classification of digital devices

 

Dear list members,

 

Being an independent testing facility, we have received a question from a
costumer regarding FCC classification. 

The consumer’s product is a small portable device for use with a musical
instrument. When the product is used normally, it is attached to the
instrument by audio Jack cables. The product is battery powered, but can be
powered by a general purpose adaptor. The product has a build-in
microprocessor and therefore clock frequencies that requires a
classification with regards to FCC (47 cfr part 15, §15.101).

For software update, programming purpose , and under these circumstances
also sometimes powering, the product has a MINI-B USB connector – depending
on variant, the product can either be supplied with or without the USB cable
in the shipping box.

 

Question is

– Is this product considered a “Class B Computer Peripheral” – which require
a DoC, and an accredited test report from an NVLAP accredited test lab and
appropriate FCC logo markings (DoC or certification procedure) ?

or 

– is the product considered  “Other Class B digital device - - “ – which
require only a verification and no FCC logo marking (Verification procedure)
?

 

Our costumer states that in their point of view the users only operates the
device with a computer connected, when they are putting the device into
operation initially or for reconfiguration, software upgrade or similar.
Therefore they claims it should not be considered Computer Peripheral since
the use of the product is very different from the use of typical computer
Peripherals like keyboard, mouse or printer.

 

Is having a USB connector enough to classify the product as a “Class B
Computer Peripheral”? Or is the use of the USB connector of importance<+

 

Does anyone in here have experience from similar cases?

 

Regards,

Niels

Niels Hougaard

Bolls ApS

Ved Gadekæret 11F

DK-3660 Stenløse

Denmark

 

T: +45 48 18 35 66

F: +45 48 18 35 30

 <mailto:n...@bolls.dk> n...@bolls.dk

 <http://www.bolls.dk/> www.bolls.dk

 

 

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to