Kevin and others ...

 

Just to make sure .

A manufacturer of a product listed within the scope of CPR (former CPD)
shall issue a Declaration of Performance. In addition, the manufacturer
shall issue a Declaration of Conformity covering the EMC and LVD (if
applicable).

In the past, a DoC could include references to CPD, EMC and LVD. Now, it has
to split into two documents.

 

Right?

 

Best regards

Amund

 

 

Fra: Harris, Kevin J (DSC) [mailto:kevinharr...@tycoint.com] 
Sendt: 10. februar 2014 14:48
Til: Amund Westin; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: RE: [PSES] SV: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

 

Amund,

 

I discussed this with the SG07 chair and was informed that they in fact
wanted to combine the testing but were advised that there were legal issues
preventing them from doing so. This means that CEN (thanks John) TC 72 are
the only ones now that can resolve the matter. Practically speaking however,
as the transition date is so near, a manufacturer can't hang about hoping
for a change at the last moment, so sadly, double testing for new equipment
is on for the next while. Note that I say only new equipment. Equipment that
is on the market already under the previous version of EN 50130-4 will
already have been tested to that standard and so will only have to test to
the deltas for the new version for EMC which they would have had to do in
any case.

 

Kind regards

 

Kevin

 

 

From: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no] 
Sent: February-07-14 5:43 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: [PSES] SV: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

 

SG07 say:

 

*        apply the EMC stadard that is called up in the applicable EN 54
standard, for CPR (former CPD) approval

*        apply the EN50130-2011 after 13 June 2014, to meet the EMC
directive

 

Best regards

Amund

 

 

 

 

Fra: Harris, Kevin J (DSC) [mailto:kevinharr...@tycoint.com] 
Sendt: 5. februar 2014 19:01
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Emne: Re: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

 

All,

 

I have consulted with TC 72 (the authors of the EN 54 series) and they are
well aware of the problem. The long term goal is to update those parts with
the dated references but in the meantime I have the following quote from the
committee 

 

"TC 72 works closely with the group of notified bodies SG07 and I am sure
that, where necessary, a common interpretative position could be produced
and published to ensure a consistent approach when testing fire detection
and fire alarm products."

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Kevin

 

By the by: An amendment to EN 50130-4:2011 is currently with the CENELEC
secretariat and is expected to go to vote in due course

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] 
Sent: February-04-14 12:38 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

 

In message < <mailto:023e01cf21ca$7b5915e0$720b41a0$@co.uk>
023e01cf21ca$7b5915e0$720b41a0$@co.uk>, dated Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Brian Jones <
<mailto:e...@brianjones.co.uk> e...@brianjones.co.uk> writes:

 

>OK, this is a problem with giving general guidance on a list such as 

>this! The guidance that I described works when the two harmonised 

>standards are harmonised under the same directive or regulation.

 

But Guide 25 is quite general; it doesn't say that its provision only
applies where the standards are harmonized under the same Directive. 

Furthermore, whether the dated reference applies or not depends on the
detail of what function the reference performs, not on general rules.

 

So we have a can of worms. At least, it seems that Guide 25 needs to be
clarified, but the main point surely is that **dated references must be
individually reviewed (by the committee officers or a delegated
rapporteur)**, preferably annually, to see if they are still valid.

--

OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See
<http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

 

-

----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> emc-p...@ieee.org>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

 <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/>
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

 

Website:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List
rules:  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas < <mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net> emcp...@radiusnorth.net>

Mike Cantwell < <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> mcantw...@ieee.org>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  < <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> j.bac...@ieee.org>

David Heald: < <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> dhe...@gmail.com>

 

  _____  


This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended for
the use of the addressees named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy
or take any action in respect of any information contained in it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail and immediately destroy this e-mail and its attachments.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net <mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net <mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 

 

  _____  


This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information intended for
the use of the addressees named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy
or take any action in respect of any information contained in it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail and immediately destroy this e-mail and its attachments.


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to