In message
<85ee5c3c683e44e6bb316a26baa77...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
, dated Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Brian Oconnell <oconne...@tamuracorp.com>
writes:
Is the requirement for battery assessment to IEC62133 intended just for
batteries that are installed in the end-use equipment, or does it also
extend to a stand-alone charger where that battery is subject to a
'temporary' insertion into a slot and is not permanently installed?
It covers everything 'portable', i.e. not installed. Whether that was
intended or not...
"Portable secondary sealed cells and batteries (other than button)
containing alkaline or other non-acid electrolyte shall comply with IEC
62133."
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
