No.

As for an EIS, the UL file will specify this in the respective section's 
general description unless the mfr has de-rated the unit, then the max 
operating temp will be in the C of A.

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:34 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors

The pump manufacturer just sent me a picture of the motor name plate which must 
somehow be hidden from view when installed in the pump assembly. Anyway, the 
motor is made in Germany and has the CE marking and the UL Recognized component 
mark.  Is this adequate to determine the pump/motor is safe for use or does it 
still have to pass the locked rotor test?

The pump manufacturer says the motor is not thermally protected but has Class F 
insulation.

I will ask if there are any Conditions of Acceptability for the motor. I can 
also ask if the motor has any component or section of the windings that acts as 
a fusible link. That would explain why the motor went open circuit before we 
could get stable temperature readings.

Thanks to all.



-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety of Small Motors

In message
<64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026CA9B0@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local>,
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2015, "Kunde, Brian" <brian_ku...@lecotc.com> writes:

>If the winding overheated and melted open, would this be considered a
>fire hazard?

Not just for that reason. Does it emit flame or flammable vapour?
61010-1 is rather too vague about what constitutes a fire hazard.

>Or because something in the motor failed before the winding temperature
>reached 190ÂșC that this motor can be considered inherently safe?

Perhaps. The standard allows a thermal cut-out:

Motors which, when stopped or prevented from starting (see 4.4.2.5), would 
present an electric shock HAZARD, a temperature HAZARD, or a fire HAZARD shall 
be protected by an overtemperature or thermal protection device meeting the 
requirements of 14.3.

Does the manufacturer say whether there is a cut-out?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk When I turn 
my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and 
Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to