Hi Lauren,

Sorry for the quick mail and lack of exact references but I'm in a rush
today......

Firstly, remember that there is no "R&TTE certified".
A product (like a wireless keyboard) might be CE Marked with a DoC based on
the intended use.

If you incorporate that product into another product......

You might have created a whole new product, which might need CE Marking.
Or, you might just be creating a system; such as the
Laptop/Monitor/Printer/Keyboard/Mouse octopus that I have on my desk before
me, with the device being used in its intended use.

If you look at the annexes at the back of EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2, you'll find
all sorts of useful guidance on combining equipment.
That's where I'd look first.

For example, we often see wireless devices with a USB connector.   By
itself, many of the EMC equipment might not be applicable (less than 3m long
cables, etc.), but EN 301 489-1 confirms which tests should be performed
with that device connected to a typical host (such as a laptop), which could
make the tests suddenly applicable (I think conducted RF immunity, etc).

For your wireless keyboard issue, you really need to consider if you are
just selling a system with the keyboard used correctly as a part of it; or
if you have created a whole new product.

I know that Charlie Blackham is on this reflector and I'll bet he could give
a good answer about the 'larger scale' compliance management of complex
systems.
:-)


Sorry for my lack of time today!


Michael.



-----Original Message-----
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] 
Sent: 12 May 2015 00:11
To: Michael Derby; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Integrating radio COSTs into other equipment

Michael, 

Do you think this applies to the case for installing a finished product? For
example if I make and industrial machine and "install" a wireless keyboard
that is already RTTE certified, have I created a new item (i.e. the machine)
that must be assessed for RTTE conformance? 

I think the common sense answer is 'no', but Commission and ETSI guidance
does not seem to address this scenario.  

Regards,
Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Integrating radio COSTs into other equipment

Hello Amund,

This is a general reply about installing CE Marked radio modules into host
products......

The important thing to remember is that there no certification process under
the R&TTE Directive and also no "modular approvals".

Anyone installing the module into a product becomes responsible for the
compliance of the overall product, with the R&TTE Directive.
Radio, EMC, Safety.

It's possible to imagine cases where the test results for the radio
performance (made by the module manufacturer, on the module) could be used
to show compliance of the overall final product.   For example, if the
module is installed ok in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, you
could imagine that the power, frequency, etc., should not be changed.   Many
module installers rely on most of the tests in the radio test report of the
module for their compliance to Article 3.2 of the R&TTE Directive.

For radiated emissions of the transmitter module (also Article 3.2) in the
final product, I know that most module manufacturers recommend that the
final host product should be re-tested and I certainly think this is a good
recommendation.   Anyone who has tested emissions of final products with
modules installed will know that the emissions from the module can sometimes
fail when installed in a host.

For EMC and Safety, it is very difficult (impossible?) to imagine that any
tests of the module might be representative of the radio's performance
inside a host; so the host should really be treated as a new product for
testing to standards like EN 301 489-7, EN 301 489-24, product safety, etc.

Finally; I see an incredibly wide variation in testing approach from module
manufacturers for CE Marking a module.   Just because it is CE Marked, does
not mean they have fully tested it for every possible installation!

This link is very useful......
http://www.rtteca.com/TGN01%20-%20May%202013.pdf



Michael.



-----Original Message-----
From: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: 11 May 2015 07:55
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Integrating radio COSTs into other equipment

RTTE approved 3G GSM module (EN 301 511) is integrated into an EN 61326-1
measurement product. 
Maybe this call for new radio tests such as radiated spurious emission.

Anyone have experience about the consequences integrating such radio COTS? 

Regards
Amund

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to