At the risk of going off topic,  I don't see anything identified at 
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html  for harmonized standards for the new 
2014/30/EU EMC and 2014/35/EU LVD directives that go into force April 2016.  
Time to start getting prepared.  Am I missing something or is it just too soon 
for them to be published?  

The same line of thinking could apply as to whether or not to start using newer 
standards sooner than later.  A benefit would be not having to go through the 
cost of additional testing to a newer standard only months later.

-Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:15 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] R&TTE OJ listing vs conflicting Reference Standards in EN 
301 489-1 v1.9.2

In message <85d45e15f71741059f90847883213...@thhste15d1be4.hs20.net>,
dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Charlie Blackham <char...@sulisconsultants.com>
writes:

>The discussion concluded that whilst final responsibility would always 
>rest with the manufacturer (and Notified Body if used), that using the 
>latest state of the art standard would be perfectly acceptable or 
>perhaps even the better decision.
>
> 
The committee that wrote the referencing standard decided to use dated 
references, and that was voted on and accepted. So how can it be a 'better 
decision' to ignore that?

While the advantages of dated and undated references are pretty evenly 
balanced, the main point in favour of dating is that the user ***is in no doubt 
which edition of the reference standard to apply***. Teaching people to 
disregard that seems extremely perverse.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk When I turn 
my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and 
Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to