In message
<by2pr02mb025a8822e481ee94e59b2d4c1...@by2pr02mb025.namprd02.prod.outlook
.com>, dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Brian Oconnell <oconne...@tamuracorp.com>
writes:
The proposal under review may include a reference to whether an
assessment of repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) was conducted for
a proposed new or revised test requirement.
This is, of course, normal for IEC and CISPR EMC test methods, also in
CENELEC 'home-grown' standards (EN 50XXX series).
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
