In message <f116faaea7ea08f9e625b495e972e...@mail.gmail.com>, dated Fri,
21 Aug 2015, Peter Tarver <ptar...@enphaseenergy.com> writes:
I'm wondering if others have experienced cases where different
manufacturers' surge test equipment (ANSI/IEEE C62.41 ring and
combination waves) with nearly identical open-circuit voltage and
short-circuit current calibrations have led to very different results.
Not personally, but it is pretty obvious that these things are not
classical Thévenin sources, so that the open-circuit voltage and the
short-circuit current are *not* sufficient to characterize the source
fully.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
