Dennis

 

And why not – seriously?

 

As was said many years ago – and often repeated! - “what’s right for the goose 
is right for the gander”.

 

In this case (and many others) In simple terms, that means that implies that 
electronic devices need to be appropriately resilient to the generally 
“predictable” levels of external interference in the environments for which 
they are designed to operate – one of the basic essential requirements of the 
EMC Directive!

 

Otherwise you might need to specify that YOUR products need to have MIL-STD-461 
levels (highest!) of immunity to try to ensure they will work “anywhere” they 
are likely to be used!

 

John E Allen

W. London, UK

 

 

From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com] 
Sent: 29 September 2016 21:53
To: 'john Allen'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

 

Not a chance

 

​​​​​

Dennis Ward

This communication and its attachements contain information from PCTEST 
Engineering Laboratory, Inc., and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
recipient(s) named above.  It may contain information that is confidential 
and/or legally privileged.  Any unauthorized use that may compromise that 
confidentiality via distribution or disclosure is prohibited.  Please notify 
the sender immediately if you receive this communication in error, and delete 
it from your computer system.  Usage of PCTEST email addresses for non-business 
related activities is strictly prohibited.  No warranty is made that the e-mail 
or attachments(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.  Thank you.

 

From: john Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:27 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

 

Almost sounds like a call for N. America to encompass our equivalent immunity 
requirements  (often denigrated - even with Europe, but they generally do seem 
to work!) J 

 

John E Allen

W. London, UK

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ghery S. Pettit [mailto:n6...@comcast.net] 
Sent: 29 September 2016 21:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

 

Preventing harmful interference in all cases is a mighty tough call.  How low 
do you need to limit emissions?  How high a signal must the product be immune 
to?  The limits in Part 15 provide a reasonable level of protection, assuming 
the potential victim is far enough away.  Co-located devices may need more 
suppression.

 

Ghery S. Pettit, NCE

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Cortland Richmond [ <mailto:k...@earthlink.net> mailto:k...@earthlink.net]

Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 12:29 PM

To:  <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Subject: Re: [PSES] [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

 

On 9/29/2016 2:07 PM, Ken Javor wrote:

> I missed out on the prologue and am curious as why Part 15 limits 

> aren't low enough. Not low enough for what?

 

Actually preventing harmful interference.  Requiring a warranty in the purchase 
contract would put manufacturers on notice that they're actually expected to do 
that -- and eat the cost of fixing things if they don't.

 

§ 15.5 General conditions of operation.

(b) Operation of an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator is 
subject to the conditions that no harmful interference is caused and that 
interference must be accepted that may be caused by the operation of an 
authorized radio station, by another intentional or unintentional radiator, by 
industrial, scientific and medical

(ISM) equipment, or by an incidental radiator.

 

§ 15.15 General technical requirements.

(c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the limits 
specified in this part will not prevent harmful interference under all 
circumstances.  Since the operators of part 15 devices are required to cease 
operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio 
frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are 
encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, 
to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these 
regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference 
problems (for example, see §15.105(b)).

 

[and (maybe -- good luck)]

 

§ 15.17 Susceptibility to interference.

(a) Parties responsible for equipment compliance are advised to consider the 
proximity and the high power of non-Government licensed radio stations, such as 
broadcast, amateur, land mobile,and non-geostationary mobile satellite feeder 
link earth stations, and of U.S. Government radio stations, which could include 
high-powered radar systems, when choosing operating frequencies during the 
design of their equipment so as to reduce the susceptibility for receiving 
harmful interference. ...

 

 

Cortland

 

-

----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> emc-p...@ieee.org>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

 <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at  
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

 

Website:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules:  
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas < <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> sdoug...@ieee.org>

Mike Cantwell < <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> mcantw...@ieee.org>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  < <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> j.bac...@ieee.org>

David Heald: < <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> dhe...@gmail.com>

 

-

----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> emc-p...@ieee.org>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

 <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at  
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

 

Website:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules:  
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas < <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> sdoug...@ieee.org>

Mike Cantwell < <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> mcantw...@ieee.org>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  < <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> j.bac...@ieee.org>

David Heald: < <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to