I think:
 
Those who know me personally have often heard me say what I consider to be a 
corollary, "Common sense is usually neither.. common or sensible".  
 
is a bit too cynical or pessimistic.  It isn't common enough, for sure, but it 
is often sensible. For example, does someone born and educated in Britain, with 
a Doctor's degree, need to apply for citizenship and take a language test 
because he can't prove that 50 years ago his French mother was in Britain 
legally?
 
Common sense says 'No', but HM Gov is said to differ.
 
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
 <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and 
Associates Rayleigh England
 
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
 
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 7:11 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Thermal equilibrium - 10% rule
 
John,
 
I agree with the common sense approach and use it frequently.  It's always 
interesting to me how I can look at a screen plot of 60 thermocouples and in a 
second or two decide, "yes this is stable".  I can even estimate how much time 
it will take to become stable as a test nears the end (usually about the time 
of a lunch break).  More than once I have attempted to write an algorithm to 
make the same projection and have failed every time.  The non-linearities and 
multiple heat sources & sinks makes this nearly impossible.
 
On a side-bar, Voltaire is quoted as saying "Common sense is not so common", 
which mean he is man with similar sensibilities as myself.  
 
Those who know me personally have often heard me say what I consider to be a 
corollary, "Common sense is usually neither.. common or sensible".  
 
 
-Doug
 
 
Douglas E Powell
Laporte, Colorado USA
 <mailto:doug...@gmail.com> doug...@gmail.com
 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01> http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

 
 
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:30 AM, john Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk 
<mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk> > wrote:
Minor comment:
Having been the Secretary to a number of BSI committees many years ago, I
sympathise with Ralph's last para as the Chairmen can be even worse than the
other Members - they "know what they know" and it can take an awful lot of
"effort" to "persuade" them that they need to "think again" - once had to
refuse to publish a Chairman's version of a new standard because it did not
meet the basic BSI guidelines for how a product standard should be written,
until I had rewritten a large part of it to make it at least reasonably
"testable" for the EMC-related requirements - a little (sometimes a lot!) of
subject knowledge is required to set appropriate test and assessment
requirements!

Unfortunately, nowadays, a large number of Committee Secretariats appear to
employ non-SME staff to run their committees and so they can be lead by the
nose by the Chairmen.

FWIW, in the context of this thread, I used to use "commonsense" in deciding
when the temperatures appeared to have stabilized - -taking into account
where the probes were located - particularly  when the observed temperatures
were substantially below the relevant Insulation Class limits.

John E Allen
W. London, UK

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com 
<mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com> ]
Sent: 06 January 2017 17:20
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Thermal equilibrium - 10% rule

For what it's worth, we measure and log temperatures at 1 minute intervals
(sometimes quicker, depending on what is being tested) and graph each data
set in Excel and look at the curves.  When they go flat (even with some
ripple), we call it stable.  Good enough for all the agencies we work with.
And I like the term steady-state much better, but what it is called isn't
terribly important as I see it.  The temperature can be stable (no further
increase observable) over a period, even if it's oscillating slightly around
a mean value.  The mean value could be the average of the last 20 or so
reading for instance.  It requires some judgement.

I empathize with John's experience about it taking "many tellings" on a
committee to get something right.  I have stopped just short of the Makita
Khrushchev United Nations technique at times!

Ralph McDiarmid
Product Compliance
Engineering
Solar Business
Schneider Electric


      


-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com 
<mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> ]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 8:21 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Thermal equilibrium - 10% rule

I understand that if the system is poorly designed there can be catastrophic
results, but the test is written assuming the equipment temperature does
equilibrate, right?

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261 <tel:%28256%29%20650-5261> 


> From: John Barnes <jrbar...@iglou.com <mailto:jrbar...@iglou.com> >
> Reply-To: <jrbar...@iglou.com <mailto:jrbar...@iglou.com> >
> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:06:24 -0500
> To: Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com 
> <mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> >
> Cc: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> >
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Thermal equilibrium - 10% rule
>
> Ken,
> Most metals have a positive Temperature Coefficient of Resistance (TCR).
> As they get hotter, their resistivity-- and the resistance of a given
> conductor-- increases.  If you have a current source (or a voltage
> source with a large series impedance) driving current through a small
> cross-section conductor with poor heat sinking for a long time, the
> conductor will go into thermal runaway-- and eventually melt in two--
> when the current through it exceeds a certain critical value,
> depending on the ambient temperature.
>
> A. J. Rainal wrote two papers about this effect on printed circuit
> boards (PCB's) about 40 years ago:
> *  Rainal, A. J., "Current-Carrying Capacity of Fine-Line Printed
>    Conductors," The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 60 no. 7, pp.
>    1375-1388, September 1981.
> *  Rainal, A. J., "Temperature Rise at a Constriction in a
>    Current-Carrying Printed Conductor," The Bell System Technical
>    Journal, vol. 55 no. 2, pp. 233-269, February 1976.
>
> Non-resettable fuses use this principle, which is specified by the
> I^2t curves in their datasheets.
>
> You may also want to read up on Preece's Law (Fuse Equations) and
> Onderdonk's Fuse Equation.
>
>
>
> John Barnes KS4GL  (retired)
> Lexington, Kentucky
> http://www.dbicorporation.com/
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> >

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> >

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> >

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> >

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> >

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> >



 
-- 
 
Douglas E Powell

doug...@gmail.com <mailto:doug...@gmail.com> 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to