Thank you all,  

This is really good stuff.  One of the things I love about this forum is the 
quick and to the point replies. These responses give me plenty to work with.  

All the best,  Doug


-- 

Douglas E Powell

doug...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01 


  Original Message  
From: 000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org
Sent: February 7, 2017 6:52 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply-to: ted.eck...@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PSES] Acoustic Warning - sound pressure level

Hello Doug,

I can expand on Bernd's assessment with an example. The fire alarm annunciators 
in my building operate at 95 dB. They are loud enough that facilities hands out 
ear plugs the morning of our routine fire drills. They are not going to be 
missed by anybody, even somebody wearing headphone or somebody in a lab working 
with loud equipment. The audio level is set to reduce the risk of complacency 
through inaction while not being so loud as to pose a risk to hearing damage. 

The higher volumes are effective. Nobody stays in their office trying to finish 
up a little work just because it's only a fire drill. The alarm is loud enough 
that everybody in the building wants to get outside.

Ted Eckert
Microsoft

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my 
employer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dürrer Bernd [mailto:bernd.duer...@wilo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Acoustic Warning - sound pressure level

Hello Doug,

depending on your environment or application, a difference of 3 to 6 dB SPL may 
not be sufficient. For example, the "Guidelines for Auditory Warning Systems on 
Civil Aircraft" (CAA Paper 82017) by Patterson recommend a difference of 15 to 
25 dB SPL to ensure that an acoustic warning is not missed. If the spectrum of 
the ambient noise can be assumed as steady and is known or can be estimated, 
the SPL of a narrow-band acoustic warning should be adapted to the noise level 
in this frequency band to avoid excessive noise levels (see Figure 1 in the 
online article below).

Besides sound pressure level, also localizability (if the warning is emitted by 
a device needing attention) and perceived urgency of the warning (if different 
warnings that require different reactions may be emitted) should be considered 
in the design.

More details can be found in the book "Warning design: A research prospective" 
by Edworthy and Adams or online in the article:

Edworthy J, Hellier E. Auditory warnings in noisy environments. Noise Health 
[serial online] 2000 [cited 2017 Feb 7];2:27-39. Available from: 
http://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2000/2/6/27/32649

Kind regards,

Bernd



Von: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 00:58
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: [PSES] Acoustic Warning - sound pressure level



​All,

I recall some time ago reading information on minimum sound pressure level for 
acoustic warning in noisy environments.  It was possibly in an IEC standard or 
a handbook making recommendations. As I recall the recommendation was something 
like warning bells, horns and klaxons should be 3 to 6 dB SPL above the ambient 
noise level in the immediate work area. If this is not possible or operators 
may be wearing hearing protection, then visual warnings should also be included.

Can someone point me in the right direction?

Thanks,  Doug



--

Douglas E Powell

mailto:doug...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on 
the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell 
<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>


________________________________


WILO SE
Nortkirchenstrasse 100, 44263 Dortmund
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 21356
www.wilo.com

Vorstand/Executive Board:
Oliver Hermes (Vorsitzender/Chairman), Dr. Markus Beukenberg, Carsten Krumm, 
Eric Lachambre, Mathias Weyers Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender/Chairman of the 
Supervisory Board:
Prof. Dr. Norbert Wieselhuber

Dieses Dokument ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Die Weitergabe sowie 
Vervielfaeltigung, Verwertung und Mitteilung seines Inhalts ist nur mit unserer 
ausdruecklichen Genehmigung gestattet. Alle Rechte vorbehalten, insbesondere 
fuer den Fall der Schutzrechtsanmeldung.

This document has to be treated confidentially. Its contents are not to be 
passed on, duplicated, exploited or disclosed without our expressed permission. 
All rights reserved, especially the right to apply for protective rights.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to