Greetings. I have a question regarding labeling of radio equipment in Brazil and Japan.
Suppose we have a product with an integrated WiFi module. U.S. FCC Rules are clear that the end product must have a visible label that states the equipment contains a module with FCC ID: xxxxxx. I think there is something similar for Canada IC certification. However, are there similar regulations for the Brazil Anatel certification or the Japan MIC certification? Neither of these certification marks on the module will be visible or accessible to the user after the module is integrated. However, I cannot find anything in the Anatel or MIC labeling requirements that state the end product needs any labeling for the integrated module. Common sense tells me there should be a label, but our product design team of course wants the fewest number of labels possible. If it's mandatory, there will be no argument, but I can't find anything in the regulations that says it is mandatory. Can someone on this list provide me a little guidance? Thank you. Jim Hulbert Pitney Bowes ________________________________ - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
