'Reliable' earthing would be per construction and test requirements of the 
scoped standard. Note the term "Reliable Earthing" is not defined in the IEV, 
but the various earthing and bonding terms are covered. As we all know, the 
earthing bond itself is supposed to be the current path for a single fault 
condition, and many product safety standards have specific test methods to 
determine if the ground bond is adequate. Other than a few appliance wiring 
standards and some building code articles (GFI and GC wiring), a single fault 
condition for the grounding conductor and attachment is not considered for most 
electrical equipment.

That is, 'reliable earthing' starts with building code, and ends with the scope 
standard's ground bond test method.

Brian


-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 9:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on AC 
mains ports?

The term Reliable Earthing is an interesting one.  Does it mean that the 
earthing bond is not expected to fail (single fault) and so provides two levels 
of protection, as in ‘reinforced” ?   I remember arguing this point many years 
ago in a product safety review at another company and meeting some considerable 
resistance (no pun intended)

Ralph McDiarmid
Product Compliance
Engineering
Solar Business
Schneider Electric


From: Joe Randolph [mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:43 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on 
AC mains ports?

Thanks everyone for the helpful input.  If I am understanding the situation 
correctly, it can be loosely summarized as follows:


IEC 60950-1

Clause 1.5.9.2

MOVs connected mains-to-earth or across the mains must have a fuse in series.  
The fuse must have “adequate breaking capacity.”

There is no mention of requiring a GDT in series with an MOV.


IEC 62368-1

Clause 5.5.7

MOVs connected mains-to-earth may be connected directly to earth only if that 
earth is “reliable” (such as a permanently connected earth).

If the earth connection is not “reliable” (earthing obtained through the 
earthing pin of ordinary Pluggable Type A connecter is not considered 
“reliable”), MOVs connected mains-to-earth must have a GDT in series, 
presumably to protect against excessive leakage current.


Annex G.8

To protect against the risk of fire, MOVs are subjected to a series of tests 
designed to overheat them and induce fire.  While series fuses are not 
explicitly required, the inclusion of a series fuse can be helpful for passing 
the tests of G.8



SUMMARY

The above summarizes my current understanding of the requirements regarding 
components to be used in series with MOVs when the MOVs are connected to the AC 
mains.  While IEC 60950-1 requires series fuses, it does not seem to require 
series GDTs

IEC 62368-1 requires series GDTs if the earth connection is not “reliable,” and 
it’s fire safeguard tests seem to encourage the use of series fuses, although 
fuses are not explicitly required in order to pass the tests.

I would appreciate any additional input that might help me determine whether 
the above interpretations are correct.


Thanks,

Joe Randolph
Telecom Design Consultant
Randolph Telecom, Inc.
781-721-2848 (USA)
mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com
http://www.randolph-telecom.com

From: John Allen [mailto:000009cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:15 AM
To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on 
AC mains ports?

Having had a look at 62368-1 Ed 2, I think the relevant clause in that is 
5.5.7. “SPDs” (“Surge Protective Devices”), 

5.5.7.1 “Use of an SPD between the mains and earth”
“Where a varistor is used between the mains and earth:
– the earth connection shall comply with 5.6.7; and
– the varistor shall comply with Clause G.8.”

Cl 5.6.7 “Reliable Earthing” could be important as that gives  familiar  
“reliable earthing” methods for some equipment.

5.5.7.2 “Use of an SPD connected to reliable earthing”
“Where an SPD is used between the mains and protective earth, it shall consist 
of a varistor
and a GDT connected in series, where the following applies:
– the varistor shall comply with Clause G.8;
– the GDT shall comply with:
• the electric strength test of 5.4.9.1 for basic insulation; and
• the external clearance and creepage distance requirements of 5.4.2 and 5.4.3
respectively for basic insulation.
NOTE 1 Some examples of SPDs are MOVs, varistors and GDTs. A varistor is 
sometimes referred to as a VDR or
a metal oxide varistor (MOV).
The above requirements do not apply to SPDs:
– intended for attenuating transient voltages from external circuits; and
– connected to reliable earth (see 5.5.7.1).”

The last bit is interesting because it “seems” to exempt SPDs from needing GDT 
protection in some circumstances – or am I misreading it?

Annex G8 “Varistors” then give detailed requirements & tests for such devices.

John E Allen
W.London, UK

From: Mick Maytum [mailto:mjmay...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 31 October 2017 10:50
To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on 
AC mains ports?

Joe,
    I'm away from my data at present. I think IEC 62368-1 in clause 1 states 
that where a consistent connection to PE/ground cannot be guaranteed, such as 
with pluggable equipment, protection from mains to the PE requires to be a GDT 
and varistor to be connected in series.
   

 
Regards,
Mick Maytum
Safety and Telecom
Standards
mailto:mjmay...@gmail.com
http://www.ictsp-essays.info

------ Original Message ------
From: "Joe Randolph" <mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com>
To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Sent: 31/10/2017 02:09:14
Subject: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on AC 
mains ports?

Hello All:
 
Aside from surge tolerance during normal type testing, are there any regulatory 
requirements regarding the placement of MOVs from line to ground on an AC mains 
input port?
 
I seem to recall that some countries or standards are concerned about potential 
hazards associated with MOVs developing high leakage current, over time, in 
response to repeated surge events.  I’ve seen circuits where a GDT was added in 
series with the MOV, and I believe this had something to do with concerns about 
MOV leakage current.
 
I’ve also seen MOVs offered for sale that are packaged in a way that physically 
couples them to a thermally-activated one-time fuse.  This implies a concern 
with the MOV becoming leaky over time and overheating.
 
While I am familiar with the potential failure mechanism of MOVs developing 
high leakage current over time, I cannot point to any published safety standard 
that imposes any construction requirements that attempt to protect against this 
failure mode.  I thought I remembered seeing something on this topic many years 
ago in a UK standard, but that was a long time ago, prior to harmonization of 
the IEC 60950 series.
 
 
Thanks,
 
Joe Randolph
Telecom Design Consultant
Randolph Telecom, Inc.
781-721-2848 (USA)
mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com
http://www.randolph-telecom.com

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to