All Is there a clause/requirement in 61010-1 similar to 60950-1 clause 2.1.1.5 where a SELV source >240 VA is not permitted to be accessible in an Operator Area
The specific example I'm looking at is a pair of rack mounted units where the 10V/40A output has been paralleled with a 2nd unit in the rack using 10cm of copper bar. When considered as single units, the DC terminals and exposed conductor are covered by a rubber boot, but this is not the case when they are ganged up [Unit 1 10V 0V, Unit 2 10V 0V] The device is currently installed in a 600mm deep rack - my thoughts are that it should be in a 800mm deep rack so that access can be restricted by a rear panel or similar - but I can't find the clause in the standard that requires this. Regards Charlie Charlie Blackham Sulis Consultants Ltd Mead House Longwater Road Eversley RG27 0NW UK Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 Email: char...@sulisconsultants.com<mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com> Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
image002.emz
Description: image002.emz
image003.emz
Description: image003.emz