On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 01:41 -0500, RogerN wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Kasunich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" 
> <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] HAL Error, what did I do wrong?
> >
> > This is a head-scratcher.
... snip
> I added another limit 2.0 to the feedback rpm going into the pid loop. 
> I limited the rate of change to 3000 rpm / sec figuring 3 rpm per 1ms 
> servo thead fperiod.  So now my negative spike generated from threading 
> resetting the spindle position will be limited to 3 rpm in one servo 
> period.  If this thing is tunable I should have a pretty nice closed 
> loop spindle control... hopefully!
> 
> Thanks again
> 
> Roger Neal

Would the analog signal from tachometer be easier to use for feedback?

Kirk Wallace


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to