This bug has been fixed in TRUNK, so it will be in EMC2 2.3 for sure.
I'm not sure if it's an oversight or if there's a "good reason" why the
fix hasn't been backported to the 2.2 branch. If it's just an
oversight, the fix will be in 2.2.6, which will be released before 2.3.
Until the fix is in a release, it's a good idea to not use spaces.
Thanks for making a tutorial!
- Steve
Greg Michalski wrote:
> I'm working on a basic graphic tutorial on my website to assist people
> with getting started in EMC2 which I'll then link to in the wiki.
> When I was making my generic setup using stepconf I used spaces in the
> name of the machine. When I went to start EMC from the Applications
> menu I got the following error:
>
> .main.f1.f2.f3.tree selection set: Cannot select unknown node
> "{/home/cadmonkey/emc2/configs/My Sieg X3/My Sieg X3.ini}".
> .main.f1.f2.f3.tree selection set: Cannot select unknown node
> "{/home/cadmonkey/emc2/configs/My Sieg X3/My Sieg X3.ini}".
> while executing
> "Tree::selection .main.f1.f2.f3.tree set
> {{/home/cadmonkey/emc2/configs/My Sieg X3/My Sieg X3.ini}}"
> ("eval" body line 1)
> invoked from within
> "eval [linsert $args 0 Tree::$cmd .main.f1.f2.f3.tree]"
> (procedure ".main.f1.f2.f3.tree" line 1)
> invoked from within
> "$tree selection set $node"
> (procedure "node_clicked" line 7)
> invoked from within
> "node_clicked "
> (command bound to event)
>
> When I made a new configuration and just named it SiegX3 it opens it
> and creates the desktop launcher without issues. Do I just advise
> people to not use spaces in the machine name or would this constitute
> something the developers need a bug report on? It's rather mundane
> IMHO - 90% of the people this is geared to are probably going to just
> setup one or two machines so they'd name it *LATHE* or *MILL*. What
> are your thoughts folks?
>
> If there's already a tutorial I apologize - I'm just trying to expand
> the options and hopefully expand our (EMC2's) user base.
>
> The best part of all this is that I just stumbled across an excellent
> motherboard for latency and performance - my current desktop (MSI
> 845PE based socket 478 2.5GHz P4) which is several years old and is
> due for a replacement/upgrade. It's latency numbers at no load were
> in the 6000-7000 range - with 28 instances of GLXGEARS and some
> surfing while playing a song over and over and copying a 4gb video
> file back and forth on the HDD and over the wired network it only got
> up to 11,000 as opposed to my current P3 controller which hits 13000
> with no extra activity.
>
> Greg
> www.distinctperspectives.com <http://www.distinctperspectives.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
