On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 20:54 -0500, Eric Keller wrote:
> I like the wiki page definition of "stupidly expensive" as "$200-300."
>  I suspect there are thousands of hobbyist cnc users out there that
> would take exception to that characterization.
> Eric
> 
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Sebastien Bailard
> <peng...@supermeta.com> wrote:
> > Interesting!
> >
> > What brand mill?  How fast can you move the table around?  Also, what
> > are your motors, electronics, etc. like?  (I'm trying to pin down some
> > known-good mill-and-motor-and-electronics toolchains to recommend to
> > our users. I'm also worried that mills make bad bootstrap RepRaps
> > because it's tricky to get rapid traverses with our stock electronics,
> > but I haven't investigated the matter in depth.)
> >
> > http://objects.reprap.org/wiki/Builders/MillStrap

... snip

This page looks like it's in desperate need of an update. It's really
hard to tell what is stupidly expensive. This may be a bit of text that
was block pasted by mistake.

I just noticed the top of the page.
"
Note: I need to clean this up.  --Sebastien Bailard 07:58, 22 February
2010 (UTC)
"

Seb may appreciate getting a hand from anyone in the RepRap, RepStrap or
MillStrap contingent.

(I _do_ find the "... WT?! " offensive)
-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to