On 3/20/2010 2:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 20 March 2010, Paul Keeton wrote:
>    
>> Gene,
>>
>>             Do you (or anyone else) see any any issue with using a separate
>> encoder and leaving the tach on the motor alone? I have seen this done on
>> other servo systems with great reliability. Normally backlash is not an
>> issue unless it is an excessive amount on those systems. You simply don't
>> use backlash comp if there is a scale on the machine. You may have to if
>> your encoder is on the screw. Almost definitely if your encoder is on the
>> motor and you have a gear box. I would have to agree about the lag time.
>> What would you suggest? And by the way, I sensed no disrespect, I asked a
>> question and you respectfully responded with an intelligent answer, and I
>> thank you for that.
>>
>> Dave
>>      
> I believe there are several here who are using the tach signal back to the
> motors controller, and the encoder output then going back to emc, and it
> apparently works quite well.  But I should let those who are do the
> testifying that it works well.
>
> I can't personally testify to that as my only machine is a thoroughly hacked,
> all new Z axis saig x1, with 262 or 425 oz steppers on it, aka the smallest
> HF they sell, with bigger tables and the rebuilt z, it does pretty well if I
> can keep the damned typos under control.
>
> It missed the first 0 after the decimal point yesterday and carved a hole in
> the side of the barrel channel of a gunstock I first carved by hand 40 some
> years ago.  So now I have some thin strips of walnut being glued up to make a
> plug for it after I squared up the hole, the original blank was about $130 in
> 1969.  With a little luck, it won't be too noticeable once its fully
> refinished.  That is basically what I was doing anyway as I'd pulled the Rem
> 788 action and its 2nd shot out Shilen 22-250 Barrel and have refitted it for
> a heavy SS Howa 1500 in 22-250.
>
> [...]
>
>    
Yikes.  That was probably painful to look at after it happened.  
Sometimes you just can't to the Estop fast enough.  :-(

Dave



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to