On 25 March 2010 13:45, Stephen Wille Padnos <spad...@sover.net> wrote:

> OK, 1527.xxx is what you'd get there.  The thing is, microsteps don't
> really increase your resolution, they're mostly there to prevent
> resonance.  The number of real steps you have, where the motor has full
> torque, is 190.985/inch.  That translates to a 0.005-ish step size.  I
> think that might also explain the 0.001 moves - nothing happens until
> you get to the next full step (or close enough that it's the closer
> one), when the motor then clicks over to that full step position.

More detail on this issue here:

http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/step/micro.html#limits


-- 
atp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to