On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 12:46 -0500, Steve Stallings wrote:
> A general rule of thumb is that the encoder should
> offer 10X the resolution of the minimum movement
> addressable by G code.
> 
> Following error can be as tight as 3 or 4 units of
> encoder resolution on a well tuned system. This
> of course does not take into account any mechanical
> deviation beyond where the encoder senses the
> motion.
> 
> Doubling the encoder resolution would cut FE in half
> provided the rest of the system is up to it.
> 
> Steve Stallings 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Baylis [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 11:41 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: [Emc-users] Encoder resolution & Following Error
> > 
> > I hope this isn't a really stupid question, but what's the 
> > relationship between encoder resolution and following error?
> > 
> > For example, the machine I'm building currently has a linear 
> > encoder of 250 cycles per inch, or 1000 counts. I assume this 
> > won't allow me to achieve
> > 0.001 following error. And I understand FE is also affected 
> > by machine rigidity, encoder noise, and other factors.
> > 
> > Is there a formula that would tell me what FE would be 
> > reasonably achievable with my machine?
> > 
> > If I install an encoder with double the resolution, will that 
> > cut my FE in half?
> > 
> > Neil

IIRC Boeing used 5X as a rule of thumb between resolution and achieved
position. Of course, I'm speaking about control surfaces not machine
tools. 

Dave
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to