I will try that. I didn't think a prox would require a debounce thanks On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Peter C. Wallace <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, dave wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:14:19 -0700 > > From: dave <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > > <[email protected]> > > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <[email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool change component > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:08 +0100, Andy Pugh wrote: > >> On 9 September 2010 14:36, Stuart Stevenson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I could also move the zero trigger to create a trigger time difference > >>> my main question is - Why to I count 2 for every pot trigger? > >> > >> Is the edge detector in the same realtime thread as the toolchange comp? > >> Is the edge pulse width too long? > >> Perhaps try changing the order in which they are added to the thread? > >> > > If it is triggering on both edges I should think that a FF to divide by > > two would fix it. > > > > Or a one shot that just masks the second pulse. > > > > > > Dave > > > Isn't there a debounce component just for this purpose? > > > Peter Wallace > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- dos centavos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
