Changed Subject since the thread split from the original question.

>From my own personal experience (hobbyist side), I found that Linuxcnc fit
the bill for me.

Why?

1. I had old computers (with blanked hard drives) lying around and did not
want to buy an OS to get operational.
2. I looked at TurboCNC and considered using freedos, but figured that
there was little to benefit me by expanding my knowledge of DOS (kinda like
learning latin - It helps some, but noone uses it any more)
3. I knew nothing about Linux and figured that it would benefit me to learn
how to use it at the same time I was learning CNC and software
4. LinuxCNC is actively supported and I found people willing to guide (and
more importantly TEACH) me how to use both Linux and LinuxCNC.

I use a 15 year old desktop (Compaq deskpro).  I ran into problems trying
to laod the CD initially but after learning the F6 - NOAPIC trick, have
successfully loaded Linux and LinuxCNC on 4-5 machines.

If your using Fanuc machines, why would you want to port them to TurboCNC?




On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:56 AM, charles green <xxzzb...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> that is certain to require a fresh clock battery and some floppy drive
> cleaning.  and $60?  does shareware run without registration fees?
>
>
> --- On Thu, 3/8/12, Mark Wendt <mark.we...@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>
> > From: Mark Wendt <mark.we...@nrl.navy.mil>
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
> > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> > Date: Thursday, March 8, 2012, 6:01 AM
>  > On 03/08/2012 08:55 AM, charles green
> > wrote:
> > >> It's true if all you want is a machine controller
> > and
> > >> nothing else.
> > >>
> > > so, again, strictly in the capacity of a machine
> > controller, turbo cnc vs linuxcnc, the comparison and
> > contrast results are what?  have you a basis for
> > comparison?  do not limit your scrutiny of the finest
> > details.
> > >
> > Again, who cares?  I have no use for a single-minded
> > system like that.
> > Since you're the proponent for machine control only, try it
> > out yourself
> > and make that determination.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity
> > Planning
> > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud
> > computing
> > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a
> > service.
> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to