On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jon Elson <[email protected]> wrote: > Kent A. Reed wrote: >> >> As an aside, it was interesting to me that while the author of the >> bitmuster article made note of the fact that different tools reported >> different numbers, he/she seemed indifferent to the actual numbers reported. >> >> > Uhhh, why bother making a measurement if you have no idea what > the numbers mean? Yeah, that may make the whole article suspect. > > Jon
I understand your thought. But even if we don't know the chemistry behind how the combustion in a car engine works, we can still use it in a practical manner. The same for using some of the numbers about latency, jitter, etc. in tuning our CNC environments. And IMHO, understanding what they mean is easier than understanding the oxidation of organic molicules in a semi-controlled environment (i.e. car engine) :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
