Exactly, Sam! In fact, I would like to see it modular in such a way as allowing more than one interpreter and motion generator going at the same time (addf motion-controller.0, addf motion-controller.1 etc). This would make it possible to run multispindle/multiturret lathes, and pick & place machines with more than one pick & place head.
-- Ralph > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:44:35 -0500 > From: sam sokolik <sa...@empirescreen.com> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and other topics from a > EMC(LinuxCNC) newbie (TheNewbie) > > Strictly from an outside observer.. I would thing that modularizing (is > that even a word) linuxcnc so like hal (that can run by itself) each > 'module' could be replaced with a different one. So - say someone > writes a different g-code parser.. or a different TP.. or whatever. > These could be hooked in easier. I like the hal architecture where > each component has pins that can be virtually hooked together. > > Again - I am coming from a 'big picture' perspective. > > sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
